The modern definition of democracy is “Form of government, where a constitution guarantees basic personal and political rights, fair and free elections, and independent courts of law.”
Therefore the key elements of a Democracy are:
Guarantee of basic Human Rights to every individual person vis-à-vis the state and its authorities as well as vis-à-vis any social groups (especially religious institutions) and vis-à-vis other persons.
Separation of Powers between the institutions of the state:
Government [Executive Power],
Parliament [Legislative Power] and
Courts of Law [Judicial Power]
Freedom of opinion, speech, press and mass media
Religious liberty
General and equal right to vote (one person, one vote)
Good Governance (focus on public interest and absence of corruption)
The U.S. president Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) defined democracy as: “Government of the people, by the people, for the people.”
The Sri Lankan style democracy can be defined as “Form of government appointed by the people, where a constitution is just a piece of paper, governing body decides the rule of the country as the ignorant people are duped to accept all that is dished out to them by the anointed governing body”.
Unfortunately for Sri Lanka even the governing body is ignorant of the meaning of a democracy…the country is somewhat a monarchical oligarchy…!
The whole senario of a long war coming to an end is indeed a cause for celebration, however thinking of the civilians and soldiers that were killed in the process of achieving this rather “premature” victory is daunting. Although I do not mean to disrupt the whole festive atmosphere and attitude, true peace can only be achieved when all Sri Lankans can live together without any discrimination on ethnic, racial or religious grounds.
It is hard to celebrate while fellow Sri Lankans are displaced from their homes, living in camps under very harsh conditions without adequate food, medicine and other basic essentials. While we celebrate we should also make this triumph of the soldiers worthwhile by extending a generous hand of help towards the displaced fellow Sri Lankans. To achieve peace one needs to change the perceptions and attitudes towards the “other”. What better way is there than extending a helping hand to those in need and proving not to anyone but ourselves that Sri Lankans are capable of taking care of their own. Through our actions we can change the perceptions and slowly contribute to the healing of all wounds and pave way to a lasting peace in the country. This effort needs to be supported by proper political solutions and actions of politicians. All the while effort must be taken to talk to the diaspora as well.
So we are at the brink of a decisive moment in time where everything depends on our actions and perceptions. As political beings humans can shape, change and transform the future.
The conspired decision of the Sri Lankan government through the foreign ministry to deny entry visa to the Swedish foreign minister at this crucial hour will tarnish the humanitarian image the government is trying so hard to portray. This image has been tested so many times over the last few weeks and months. For example, after denying the use of heavy weapons for so long the government recently announced it had given orders to the army to stop using heavy weapons from now on – which suggest that the army did use these weapons amidst the vehement denials. The initial count of people trapped in the “Safe zone” has been proven wrong by the numbers that crossed over. These are subtle things that point fingers at the negligent behaviour of a responsible sovereign state government. The latest issue of denying entry visa to the Swedish foreign minister only casts doubt at the government further. There is a lot at stake here which the government needs to reconsider. The government has so far been successful in rescuing those innocent people amidst the cries of the diaspora and to prove the capability and determination of the government to protect and safeguard its citizens. Why put all the efforts at risk?
Given the conflict management and resolution expertise vested in the Swedish foreign minister it is definitely worthwhile to lend an ear to his suggestions. There is no hard and fast rule that the government of Sri Lanka need to exercise these suggestions as these are merely “suggestions”. Even if the government did invite the Swedish foreign minister for a different function in May, considering the prominence of getting an opinion as well as showing representatives of the international community the efforts the government has put in place to accommodate the IDPs, it is a smart move to extend an invitation to the Swedes together with the British and French delegation.
After all if the government can give these delegates as well as a few international media personnel access to the IDP camps and the battle field(I know it is pushing it a bit what with the governments no outside media policy) it might actually support the governments image rather than tarnish it. If what we see and hear on National TV where the rescued people talk about the atrocities they suffered at the hands of the LTTE and the negligence of human life by the LTTE is in fact true then the government should indeed let some of these delegates and international media in and let them talk to these people. They should witness the rest of the country pulling together to support their fellow citizens. This might help not only to depict that the government is not trying to commit genocide etc that the diaspora are portraying but that it is actually doing it’s duty to it’s people as a responsible state government.
By extending a grant to visit the country to the Swedes or any other country does not necessarily mean the government is bowing down to the international community or that the government needs to implement whatever they are suggesting. It is merely to show that the government is open for suggestions. Note “suggestions”. In a globalised world a country cannot be an island.Instead of pointing fingers at other international media outlets and leaders for being supporters of the LTTE why not prove the point by granting some of these international leaders and media access to the country and showing them the truth.
After all it is a wise move to keep the international community at hand now that we are close to phase ii, development and rehabilitation which is a costly affair by itself.
The frenzied demonstrations have begun only when the military defeat of the LTTE appears a real prospect. Again, the confusion between humanitarian protest and political solidarity with the LTTE is evident. But this still leaves open the question: what explains the widespread support that the LTTE enjoys in the diaspora despite its declining fortunes in Sri Lanka, and the atrocities it commits against ordinary Tamil people there?
…”
Tamil diaspora demonstrating political solidarity with the LTTE while hundreds and thousands of innocent Tamil people in the Wanni are being forcefully kept as human shields is just appalling. As this blog noted earlier the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora seem to have conveniently forgotten that saving the lives of the innocent is far more important than saving the life of a leader who has brought nothing but grief, death and suffering to these fellow Sri Lankans. The uproar in the streets of Paris, London and Toronto displays the reality of a dream being lost for the Tamil diaspora and ironically the diaspora lived this dream on the expense of the thousands of fellow Sri Lankan Tamil citizens forcefully trapped by the LTTE.
The brutality of the LTTE is out in the open as this video footage shows the civilians being bashed and shot at when trying to escape from their clutches. Why are the diaspora still shouting for the safety of Prabhakaran? Would they trade their lives for the ones seen here beaten and shot at by the so called liberators of the Tamil people? I don’t think so.
We all have to get together now to help these civilians. All Sri Lankans together can help these people.
Labour member of Parliament in London, Jeremy Corbyn was the moderator of the “Forum” show broadcast by Press TV of Iran. The show discussed the situation of Sri Lanka and the current war. The panel involved conservative member of Parliament and member of the House of Lords, Lord Naseby, nominee to the Sri Lanka Embassy London, Mr Douglas Wikramaratne, Labour member of the European Parliament for London, Mr Robert Evans and spokesman of the British Tamil Forum, Suren Surendran. A live audience contributed with questions and it was a gut wrenching 47 minutes and 55 seconds. Several excerpts of this show appeared in several newspapers over the last couple of days as well.
The obviously organised demonstrations carried out in London, Norway, Paris and Sydney by the Tamil diaspora is somewhat disheartening and guile. You see placards of “Let our people remain in our homeland” and yet they seem oblivious to the fact that the people trapped in the war stricken pocket of land are in their homeland as hostages or as shrapnel sponges of the LTTE leadership. What seem to be dished out is their anger that the “homeland” they sponsored all this time was only an illusion as most of the money seem to have gone into killing machines of all sorts. These guns that they so funded are today used to shoot down any relative of theirs who try to escape the clutches of the LTTE. So how can these people cry for the dead and wounded when they have no idea of the suffering of the people still trapped in war stricken areas. There is no visible evidence of a homeland that the LTTE has built for these people what is evident is that these innocent civilians has become a mere human blanket for the egotist terrorist leader to hide in.
These diaspora seem not to realise that the flag they so proudly raise advocates terror. This flag depicts guns and bullets and the diaspora is willing to stand by and support terror while their relatives, friends and fellow citizens are dying every single day. They do not shout to help the people displaced or the people who are held against their will by the LTTE. The diaspora shouts to save their leader! They have definitely shown the will power to stand behind a megalomaniac leader and not their own people. It is easy to do that when they are in their own comfort zone while the fellow citizens in Wanni struggle to survive.
Protest in Sydney
It is a disgrace to quote from the nonviolent move of Gandhi when they are holding placards of a egotist with a revolver in his belt and a cyanide capsule hanging from his neck. Where is the non-violence in the flags and placards they are waving? When did glorifying a leader who preaches and advocates violence justified non-violent? The Tamil diaspora needs to evaluate their decision to support war from their comfortable adopted countries as opposed to extending a helping hand to the civilians who are at the receiving end of this war in Sri Lanka. It is high time they stopped this nonsensical rantings and got their act together to pressure the LTTE to release these civilians.
Why can not the diaspora organise means to help the people who have escaped the clutches of these terrorists? Rather than waving a flag that depicts weapons which can kill people why not wave a flag of hope and extend a hand to their fellow citizens in need at this timely hour. The people already displaced in their own homeland does not have the money to organise massive rallies around the globe to ask for assistance. The diaspora should consider taking a step back to open their eyes and ears to see and listen to the pleas of their brothers and sisters in the Wanni and lend a hand to help them live. At least that is what the people in the “homeland” we call Sri Lanka are trying to do at the moment.
“This late dissension grown betwixt the peers
Burns under feigned ashes of forged love
And will at last break out into a flame.”
- William Shakespeare
It boils down to the end now, this war of almost thirty years. Yet the end seem to be very decisive. The soldiers have a grave task ahead, what with the last of the terrorists hiding among the civilians and turning their weapons against the poor people trying to escape these clutches of madness. There is no easy way at least that is certain. Given the use of civilians as protection in the past there is a possibility that the sadist terrorist leader might attempt to pull off an eleventh hour battle amidst the innocent civilians.
Although it is easier said than done and most people have doubts whether a theory of dissent can be realised in a situation as such. It is apparent however that there are traces of dissent among the civilians who have gone through atrocities that none of the other Sri Lankans have gone through. The stories of the people who escaped from the reigns of terror hints of dissent. These ashes kindled to a soft flame can burn bright when the time is right. An uprising combined with the brave effort of the soldiers will give the innocent civilians as well as all Sri Lankans hope that this war could end soon.
Yesterday I was reading the papers and was left with a sense of…uncertainty?… after reading two articles. The first article refers to the Ministry of Defence web article titled, “A CARE harbour for terrorists – Intelligence reports reveal” written with reference to a CARE International report issued on 18 March 2009. The second article I refer to is the actual CARE International report published on its website titled, “CARE Aid Worker Killed in Sri Lanka Conflict”. Now reading the Defence article the impression I got was that the government wants to make sure that we, the general public, understand NGOs and INGOs are all BAD. These organisations are all harbouring terrorists and they are up to no good and write pointless pro-LTTE reports. Furthermore the Defence Ministry article states that the CARE report points out that sheling from the government forces resulted in the death of Mr Sabesan, who was an aid worker working in the Mulativu district under CARE International. I quote the Defence Ministry article,
“The latest evidence of this abominable conspiracy against this island nation was bared when one INGO with the acronym “CARE” issued a press communiqué‚ that the one of its so-called “aid workers” was killed due to the shelling by the Sri Lanka Army during recent clashes in Wanni. According to the INGO, the killed “aid worker” one ” Mr. Sabesan, was amongst those staff members that were unable to leave the area” when the government asked the INGO’s other than Red Cross and UN affiliated bodies to leave the conflict zone in September 2008.”
Note: The conclusion given by the government is that this man died due to government shelling or is claimed to have been.
I was not satisfied with the way the Defence Ministry web article attemtpted to convince the reader that the government was being blamed and these organisations are all hoodwinking the rest of us. This attempt of persuasion actually led me to read the actual CARE International article as mentioned above. This article had no mention of who fired whom or whether it was the government to blame. I quote a paragraph of the CARE International article that relates to what the Defence Ministry has quoted above,
“Mr. Sabesan, 24, had been working for CARE as a caretaker in the Mulliativu District office since March 2005. Yesterday afternoon in the no-fire zone, Mr. Sabesan’s leg was severed as a result of shelling, and due to a lack of access to the necessary medical care, he later died. His funeral was held today.”
Note: No mention of whose fire killed this man in the actual report.
This led me to question why the government is attempting to whitewash itself when there is no requirement to do so. If it is to convince the general public that any NGO or INGO out there is against the government and needs to be condemend this sort of irrational ranting is not helping the government’s image at all. We know the government is doing a tremendous job in trying to end terrorism once and for all from this beautiful island country of ours. However in this process if the government intends to take the general public as deaf, dumb and dumber then it is not good. The public need not be convinced that the government is doing a good job and that there are others who are trying to give the government a bad name. With articles as such the public can actually put two and two together and realise who is telling the truth and not. It is this parrot-fed attitude that disowns the people of intellectual capabilities. We were trained to pass exams with the parroit-fed method and if the government thinks that they need to reiterate each fact to the public by parrot-feeding them I am afraid this only leads to a brain washed population who hangs on every word that drops out of the government. There is no requirement for the government to go into these extreme ends to convince the population.The population believes the government can stop the war. However the government will have to convinve the public by actual practice and example in areas of economic and social realms that it can provide. This argument is for another day getting back to the articles in question, what does the government intend to achieve by condemning these INGOs and NGOs? The ICRC which is an INGO is providing the means to transport not only the civilians who are being held by the LTTE but also mediating the transport of the bodies of fallen heroes. If not for this INGO what would the fate of the Sri Lankans trapped in the clutches of LTTE be? How can the government grant closure to the families of war veterans?
INGOs and NGOs will be of a great advantage once the government eliminates terrorism from the country. We need to have de-mining and clearing of land and sea in the North and Northeast. We need all the infrastructure work including housing, schools, industry, road work, railroads, water sanitation etc to be laid out for people to be able to return to their homes. These are just a handful of reasons as to why we would need the assistance of these INGOs and NGOs in the future. The work carried out by these organisations need to be subject to periodic monitoring and evaluation procedures where the government can have a tab on their progress. Accountability reports need to be completed. The government needs to have checks and balances in its actions.
We do not need this type of blame games to be convinced of the government effort taken towards the betterment of the country all the public need is proof of ACTION. So far we are convinced the government is heading in the right direction towards putting an end to this war and it has proved this in action; however we are yet to witness proof and action that the government can treat each person in this country as Sri Lankans who have the right to live, speak and work in this great island of ours no matter what ethnicity, religion, class or media company they represent.
“To sum up then: On the part of the Tamils, the choice is whether they opt for a moderate leadership which the Sinhalese will be willing to share power with, on a basis that the Sinhalese are willing to accept, or whether they wish to live in permamnt confrontation by choosing a leadership whose immoderate demands will be unacceptable to the Sinhala majority.”
If Dayan is referring to the current leadership in Sri Lanka to be the “moderate”leadership to govern this country in a post-war scenario, I wonder if we will have the backing of a majority of Tamils let alone the “moderate” Sri Lankans (Note In the use of “Sri Lankans” here I refer to the rest of the population in Sri Lanka eg Sinhala, Muslim etc). Although we do agree that the initiative to stop this war instead of milking it is one of the greatest deeds of this government simultaneously we need to observe the rest of its character record as well. The government propaganda spells out nationalism without doubt. The killing of prominent media personnel, mysterious disappearances and abductions of numerous other journalists and the iron hand over the rights of not of just those trapped in IDP camps but also of the general population who are frankly in my humble opinion brainwashed by the government propaganda. This is why people end up dumping media reports like the recent SBS report “Hunting the Tigers” as pro-LTTE. Frankly the reaction of the Defence Secretary in this clip is very disturbing. It leaves us to the conclusion that he is taking the business of securing the country to a personal level!
Then there is the question of whether the Tamil people who are being harassed daily on the streets as well as in the IDP camps and war stricken areas would be able to work or live freely under this sort of government attitude, where imho all Tamils are seen as LTTE? Of course there needs to be a compromise between the Sinhalese and the Tamils but for it to happen we need to first give reassurance to the Tamil people that the Sinhalese are willing to go one step further and drop the nationalist agenda as should the Tamils who need to stop feeding terrorist leadership like that of Prabhakaran and realise that there is a possibility of finding a solution without killing lives of innocent Tamils and Sinhalese. It all comes down to an issue of trust and good leadership.
This is where we get disappointed by the likes of Dayan and Rajiva who are two great intellectuals with the capability of opening avenues to enlighten and inform the Sri Lankan expatriates, specifically the Tamil diaspora that are being misled by LTTE propaganda. We need good leaders to close the gap between the Tamil-Sinhala divide not those who further separate it.
Posted by principalamzy 
