The conspired decision of the Sri Lankan government through the foreign ministry to deny entry visa to the Swedish foreign minister at this crucial hour will tarnish the humanitarian image the government is trying so hard to portray. This image has been tested so many times over the last few weeks and months. For example, after denying the use of heavy weapons for so long the government recently announced it had given orders to the army to stop using heavy weapons from now on – which suggest that the army did use these weapons amidst the vehement denials. The initial count of people trapped in the “Safe zone” has been proven wrong by the numbers that crossed over. These are subtle things that point fingers at the negligent behaviour of a responsible sovereign state government. The latest issue of denying entry visa to the Swedish foreign minister only casts doubt at the government further. There is a lot at stake here which the government needs to reconsider. The government has so far been successful in rescuing those innocent people amidst the cries of the diaspora and to prove the capability and determination of the government to protect and safeguard its citizens. Why put all the efforts at risk?
Given the conflict management and resolution expertise vested in the Swedish foreign minister it is definitely worthwhile to lend an ear to his suggestions. There is no hard and fast rule that the government of Sri Lanka need to exercise these suggestions as these are merely “suggestions”. Even if the government did invite the Swedish foreign minister for a different function in May, considering the prominence of getting an opinion as well as showing representatives of the international community the efforts the government has put in place to accommodate the IDPs, it is a smart move to extend an invitation to the Swedes together with the British and French delegation.
After all if the government can give these delegates as well as a few international media personnel access to the IDP camps and the battle field(I know it is pushing it a bit what with the governments no outside media policy) it might actually support the governments image rather than tarnish it. If what we see and hear on National TV where the rescued people talk about the atrocities they suffered at the hands of the LTTE and the negligence of human life by the LTTE is in fact true then the government should indeed let some of these delegates and international media in and let them talk to these people. They should witness the rest of the country pulling together to support their fellow citizens. This might help not only to depict that the government is not trying to commit genocide etc that the diaspora are portraying but that it is actually doing it’s duty to it’s people as a responsible state government.
By extending a grant to visit the country to the Swedes or any other country does not necessarily mean the government is bowing down to the international community or that the government needs to implement whatever they are suggesting. It is merely to show that the government is open for suggestions. Note “suggestions”. In a globalised world a country cannot be an island.Instead of pointing fingers at other international media outlets and leaders for being supporters of the LTTE why not prove the point by granting some of these international leaders and media access to the country and showing them the truth.
After all it is a wise move to keep the international community at hand now that we are close to phase ii, development and rehabilitation which is a costly affair by itself.
I do not think the Army ever denied the use of heavy weapons against the terrorists. They only denied using it against the civilians.
)
@kayhaytha: Yes the army denied using heavy weapons against civilians but the ironic part about it is that the terrorists are amidst the civilians and as a consequence the civilians simply become collateral. This is why there is no clean war.